Jennifer strong henderson indiana marriage

Singleton v. Parks v. David McIlwain v. Brandau v. Carol J. Robert B. Stroube, M. Krystal R. Benzine v. Charles R. Jenkins v. Gooch v. Stadter v. Jennifer L. Boone v. Virginia Department of Environmental Quality et al. Medical Facilities of America, etc. Acts ch. Mwangi v. Alexander v. Dewayne W. Monroe Henson, Jr. Paul C. Coleman v. Rogers v. Deborah N. Newman Tire Company, Inc. Courture v. Broadhead, Jr. Dowden, Jr. Hercules, Inc. Virginia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, et al.

Lourenda A. Duane Howard v. White v. Wood v. Charles H. Miller v. Asble v. Hutter, Inc. Stroude, M. Brothers, III v. Wainwright v. Virginia Imports, Ltd. Jordan v. Virginia Natural Gas, Inc. James Milton Carter, Jr. Battle v. Rozario v. Waddler v. Pharr v. Burrell v. Pryor, Jr. Leslie C. Ely, Graycon, Inc. Mathew L. Bailey, et al. Fairfax County School Board, et al. King v. James L. Thomas L. Fox, Jr. Charity v. Campbell v. Betty J. Garnett, Jr. Commonwealth; as appellant did not enter a constitutionally valid guilty plea under Code Section Klein v.

Karen N. Dale Martin, et al. Matthew L. Karen T. Solar and Ace American Insurance Company v. Carolyn E. Bolden v. Rice, Sr. Rice v. Benjamin H. Rice, Jr. John L. Cost v. Victor John Vuturo, Jr. Bryant v. Kerren B. Gilberto Salazar, Jr. Steven M. Cartwright v.

Kimberly R. Gilman v. Clifford v. Maha Lakshmi Motors, Inc. Washington v. Stiles v. Pamela L.


  • phone cell e-mail family forward friends list living.
  • pasco county clerk of court official records.
  • what dose a gahna mobile number look like.
  • Housing Cases Summary Page?
  • Navigation menu!
  • Upper Canada (Ontario) Central Marriage Database;

Shropshire v. Smith v. McMillan Personnel Service, Inc. Peggy H. William V. Powers, Jr. David T. Kristan Mayer and Marty Cullen, Jr. Palmer v. Roman v. Ondeo Degremont, Inc. Ward v. Epps, Sheriff of City of Petersburg, Virginia v. Michael A. Stillwell v. Lewis Tree Service, Inc. Vanderwoude Hill and James J. Hill v. Michels v. Carl Francis Irwin, Jr.

Tuck v. Shifflett v.

Married // Jennifer & David

Barnes v. Ramar Coal Company, Inc. Turner, Sr. Marian R. Evelyn v. Young, Jr. Rattner, M. Epps, Sheriff of the City of Petersburg, Virginia v. Denise v. Philip C. Tencer v. Warren P. Tommie J. Epps, Sheriff of City of Petersburg v. Campbell and Campbell Lumber Co. Fields v. Gray v. Charles W. Sandra H. Ana S. Jamie W. Lancaster, et al. State Water Control Board, et al.

Summit Contractors, Inc. Barrs v. Carl A. Commonwealth of Virginia Board of Education, et al. Altice v. Leonard L. Gonzalez v. Dean Christian v. Jerry W. Mullin, III v. Shirley N. Bomar v. Ava W. Mina v. Mark T. Randolph v. Morris v. Hodges v. Artis v. Garraghty v. Rutledge v. Ronald L. Ranney v. Keith v. Southern Tank Transport, Inc. Jeter v. Giannoukos v. Lynn E. Foster v. Cirrito v. Thomas J. Alf Adler, M.

Long Akers v. Hackler v. Janice W. CW, Dept. Virginia Marine Resources Commissin, et al. Waters v. Cutright v. Styles, Jr. Hoebelheinrich v. Nancy A. Spriggs v. Farnsworth v. Navas v. Ottenberg's Bakers, Inc. Commonwealth, Dept. Michael E. Yopp v. Hudgins v. Pearson v. McKnight v. Allman v. Strout v. In the absence of such proof, appellant was not entitled to a blood test. Slade v. People, Inc. Courembis v. Sylvia L. Davis Jones v. Robert M. Case is reversed and remanded with direction that a judgment be entered against father for arrearages.

Cynthia H. Case is reversed and remanded with direction to entertain appellant's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint seeking to substitute VAC's name as a party-respondent. Police properly impounded the vehicle appellant was driving because he could neither produce proof of ownership nor a valid driver's license.

Frank J. Thornton Hall, Inc. Keil Plumbing and Heating, Inc. Wheeler v Cathleen N. Obstetrics,et al v Lawanda P. Vasaio v Dept. Princiotto v Robert P. Harrison, Sr. Tazewell Dept. Hall v Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. Smith v Harold E. Smith, Jr. Vinson v. William E. Vinson, Sr. Mulvey v Maurice A. Watts, Sr. Robinson, Jr. Wright v Sallie D. Baker v Mildred B. Owens v York Co. Albert v Cynthia G. Peacock v Browning Ferris, Inc. School Board et al. Beach General Hosp. Smith v Ellis H. Leavell, Jr. Kidder v Va. Vehicular Invol. Uhlenhake v Pro-Football, Inc.

Shoup v Heidi S. En Banc, dec. Walson v Robert C. Hill, Jr. Patton, Jr. Tweed, Jr. Blaustein v Mitre Corporation, et al. Simonds v Fairfax County Dept. Rubio v Ernesto G. Finley, Jr. Green, Sr. Cloutier v Thomas W. Ellett v Cynthia H. Central, et al. B James Isaac Medlin, Jr. Injury Comp. Hickson v Robert D. Glanz v Richard S. Mendelson, Spec. Mardula Esq et al v Richard S. Ctr et al v. Mahoney, Sr. Germek v Marsha K. Sullivan, Jr. Patel v Noel P.

Shriver Hering v. Phyllis E. Stockdale, Jr. Hawthorne v Smyth Co. Whitaker v Robin L. Day, et al. TC affirming DEQ's decision denying reim. Giles, Jr. Campbell v Michael C. John K. Kyhl v Betty C. Goldhamer v Deborah E. Shoup v Francis E. DSSto determine pub. TitleIV Bryon K. Smith, Director, et al. Upchurch, Jr. Mosley v Donna S.

Brown v Joseph B. Brown v Mark R. Code Matthews, Jr. Richardson v Joseph L. Sours, Jr. Scott v. Bahen, Jr. Kelln v Amanda F. Keith Hastie v Ellen D. Du Pont De Nemours, et al. Moran v Curtis E. Moran, Jr. Juror No. Penrod v James E. Wells v Billy R. Wells, Jr. Horn v Clyde J.

Smith v Dept. Vernon stat. Seltzer Katherine D. Hilliards v Larry Jackson, Comm. School Board v Delorice M. Ruckman, Jr. Armel, Jr. CW proof re:caliber crit. Rhodes v. Joseph M. Rooney misappropriated funds or for non-corp. Barker v Nancy J. Hutchins v Rosana L. Wilson v Marilyn H. Langley v Anne P. Brooks v. VEC's decis. Frazier v CW, D. Gnadt, Jr. Christensen v Janalee M. Luczkovich v Katherine H. Carlson, et al. Mililtary Aff. Jennings, Sr. K's Donuts Shop, et al.

Pearsall, et al. White v Drema C. McIntyre v Garnet M. Highsmith, Jr. Street v Joyal C.

Johnson v Edgar D. Dissent Stuart M. Bergman v Janice L. Bergman v Stuart M. Pelfrey v Linda M. Baker, Jr. Loehr, et al. Wileman, Jr. Lux, Jr. Defendants own a single-family home in Cheyenne, Wyoming, as well as a number of other small rental properties in that area. Additional relief includes: an injunction prohibiting discriminatory housing practices by the defendants in the future; mandatory fair housing training for Mr. Barone and his employees; and an agreement that Ms. Barone will withdraw from the management of rental properties. On October 22, , the court Lawson, J. Barrett M.

The Division's complaint , filed October 9, , alleged that John Barrett, an Athens, Georgia apartment-complex owner and developer, violated the Fair Housing Act by failing to construct accessible housing in seven apartment complexes which he owns and operates. In addition to Mr. Barrett, the complaint named several companies with which he is associated as defendants in the lawsuit. Three of the apartment complexes are located in Athens, Georgia; two are located in Statesboro, Georgia; and one is located in Greenville, North Carolina.

By signing the decree, the defendants admitted their failure to design and construct the subject properties in compliance with the requirements of the Fair Housing Act. The consent decree requires Mr. Barrett and his companies over the next 15 months over the next 15 months to retrofit the public and common use areas of the seven complexes and of the individual apartments units to make them accessible to persons with disabilities. Among the features which will be retrofitted are bedroom and bathroom doors which are too narrow to accommodate persons who use wheelchairs; clear floor space in bathrooms that is inadequate for use by persons in wheelchairs; and excessive sloping of the pavement leading up to dwelling unit entrances as well as the thresholds to those entrances which makes it difficult for persons who use wheelchairs to enter units.

On August 23, , the court entered a consent order in United States v. Bathrick D. The United States' complaint , which was filed on December 19, , alleged that Ronald Bathrick engaged in discrimination on the basis of sex, including severe, pervasive, and unwelcome sexual harassment in rental units he owned and managed in Hastings and St. Paul, Minnesota. The complaint was originally brought to the Division's attention through a private local attorney. The complaint alleges that Bay View discriminates on the basis of religion by prohibiting non-Christians from becoming members of the Association and owning homes in the Bay View community, a summer resort on Little Traverse Bay in Emmet County, Michigan.

The settlement requires that Bay View amend its bylaws, articles of association, and membership application materials to eliminate the religious restriction on membership. The case was originally referred to the Division after the Department of Housing and Urban Development HUD received several complaints, conducted an investigation and issued charges of discrimination. The court entered the consent decree on July 18, Enterprises, Inc. On May 2, , the court entered a consent order in United States v. The complaint, which was filed on December 10, , and amended on November 2, , alleged that a towing company in Norfolk, Virginia towed and sold a Navy Lieutenant's car without a court order, in violation of the SCRA.

The complaint also alleged that the defendants may have towed and sold at least twenty servicemembers' cars without court orders. On November 6, , the court issued an order on summary judgment resolving "a question of first impression" by adopting the United States' position that Section of the SCRA is a strict liability statute and finding that servicemembers need not notify towing companies of their active duty status in order to benefit from the SCRA's protections.

The court rejected defendants' arguments that it is impractical to verify a vehicle owner's military status and ruled that, "even if the defendants exercised the utmost care in investigating their victims' military status, they face liability for their actions. On December 2, , the court entered a consent decree resolving United States v. Beaudet D. The Defendant, David R. Beaudet, has owned and managed numerous single-family rental homes throughout St.

Paul since The complaint , filed February 19, , alleged that Beaudet subjected female tenants to severe, pervasive, and unwelcome sexual harassment. Specifically, the complaint alleged that he subjected female tenants to unwanted sexual touching and advances, conditioned the terms of women's tenancy on the granting of sexual favors, and entered the apartments of female tenants without permission or notice.

He has also agreed to hire a management company to manage his rental properties. Bedford Development S. Belshaw C. The complaint , which was filed on April 10, , alleged that a California landlord violated the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act SCRA when he refused to return pet and key deposits to a United States Air Force Lieutenant after he lawfully terminated his lease prior to move-in upon receipt of military orders requiring him to relocate to Texas. Bensalem Township E.

On September 1, , the parties entered a settlement agreement in United States v. As part of the agreement, Bensalem Township, Pennsylvania will permit the Bensalem Masjid, a Muslim nonprofit religious organization, to use its property for the purpose of building a mosque. The complaint , which was filed on July 21, , alleged that the Township violated the substantial burden, equal terms, nondiscrimination, and unreasonable limitations provisions of RLUIPA by denying the Bensalem Masjid a use variance to build a mosque on its property.

The complaint also alleged that the Township only permitted places of worship on properties zoned as part of the Institutional District, and no properties with that zoning designation were available in that district when the Bensalem Masjid acquired the property. Bernards Township D. Biafora's Inc. Big D Enterprises, Inc. The United States had filed this case after a determination by the Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD] that reasonable cause existed to believe that the defendants refused to rent to an African American household.

Our complaint , filed on March 13, , added a claim that this refusal to rent to black persons was part of a pattern or practice of racial discrimination in rentals. The defendants appealed the jury verdict and the district court's injunction prohibiting the defendants from engaging in future acts of discrimination. The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's judgment and its opinion is reported at F. The Bigelow Group, Inc. Blackpipe State Bank D. Black Wolf, Inc.

Marriage and Inequality in Chinese Society

The Mounty N. Blueberry Hill Associates W. Blue Meadows Apartments D. On February 22, , the United States filed a complaint and entered into a settlement agreement in United States v. Board of Commissioners of the County of Montezuma D. Boston Housing Authority D. Bouquet Builders, Inc. United States and Prach v. Bowen Property Management E. Boyers' Personal Care Homes W. Breckenridge Plaza E. Brazoria Manor Apartments, Ltd. On June 14, , the court entered the consent decree in United States v.

Brinson D. The complaint , filed on July 10, , alleged that the property owners violated the Fair Housing Act by placing a series of written advertisements that indicated a preference against renting to families with children, and denying the family with children--who responded to one of the advertisement-- the opportunity to rent a single-family home. The complaint also alleges that the series of advertisements amounts to a pattern or practice of familial status discrimination. The complaint alleges that the defendants failed to design and construct an apartment building in Denver, Colorado in a manner that complies with the accessibility requirements of the Fair Housing.

Brooklyn Park 73rd Leased Housing Assoc. On January 22, , the court entered a consent decree in United States v. Brooklyn Park 73 rd Leased Housing Assoc. The complaint , filed on May 18, , alleged that the owners and managers of an apartment complex in Brooklyn Park, Minnesota placed undue conditions on a woman's request to live with her assistance animal and then refused to renew her lease in violation of the Fair Housing Act.

Emily Henderson

Bruno D. The United States alleges that the defendants violated 42 U. Bruno is currently incarcerated on charges arising out of his exploitation of minor female children of tenants. On April 19, , the court entered a supplemental consent order in United States v. The complaint , filed on April 19, , alleged the defendants failed to design and construct nine multifamily properties in Mississippi, Louisiana, and Tennessee in compliance with the Fair Housing Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act. On May 15, , the court entered a partial consent order with the nine architects and civil engineers.

The second partial consent order , entered on February 24, , required the developer, builder, and original owner defendants to complete retrofits at each property to bring them into compliance with the FHA and ADA. Both partial consent orders required the defendants to undergo training on the Fair Housing Act and to provide periodic reports to the government.

The supplemental consent order transfers the responsibility for completing the retrofits at two of the nine properties, and having them inspected and certified, from the developer, builder, and original owner defendants to the current property owners. The supplemental consent order also allows the current owners to access accessibility funds created in the original consent order to help pay for the costs of retrofits. Bryan Construction Co.

California Auto Finance C. On June 14, , the complaint was amended to include a related entity called 3 rd Generation, Inc. Camden Property Trust D. Camp Riverview, Inc. Canal Street Apartments D. Candlelight Manor Condominium Association W. Capital One, N.

On April 5, , the court entered a consent decree resolving United States v. Carter M. The defendants own and operate several apartment properties in and around Sylvester, Georgia. The consent decree will remain in effect for two years and three months. Cedar Builders, Inc. The original HUD election complaint, filed on December 20, , alleged that the defendant violated the Fair Housing Act on the basis of sex by subjecting two female HUD complainants to sexual harassment.

The amended complaint adds a pattern or practice and group of persons claim. Chandler Gardens Realty, Inc. Chateau Village Apartments N. The complaint , which was filed simultaneously with the consent decree by the United States Attorney's Office on April 19, , alleged that the owners of an apartment building in Carol Stream, Illinois refused to make a reasonable accommodation to allow the HUD complainant to move from a one-bedroom unit to a two-bedroom unit which had fewer steps and had more room for her therapeutic equipment , even though she had obtained a Section 8 voucher for a two-bedroom unit.

Because of this refusal, the complainant allegedly was forced to move out. The decree will remain in effect for three years. Choice Property Consultants, Inc. Christensen D. Citizens Republic Bancorp, Inc. CitiFinancial Credit Co. On September 18, , the United States filed a complaint and executed a settlement agreement in United States v. The complaint alleged that Citi repossessed automobiles between and from protected servicemembers without first obtaining court orders, in violation of Section of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act SCRA.

City of Beaumont, Texas E. On June 16, , the court entered a consent decree in United States v. City of Beaumont E. The complaint , which was filed on May 26, , alleged that the City implemented and enforced spacing requirements and overly restrictive fire code regulations for small group homes for individuals with intellectual or developmental disabilities, in violation of the Fair Housing Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act. In addition, the City consented to injunctive relief, including ceasing enforcement of its spacing requirements and overly restrictive fire code regulations, implementing a comprehensive reasonable accommodation policy, requiring its officials to attend fair housing training, and appointing a fair housing compliance officer.

City of Blakely Housing Authority M. City of Chicago Heights N. City and County of Honolulu D. City of Columbus S. City of Des Plaines, Illinois N. City of Fairview Heights S. City of Farmersville, Texas E. On April 16, , the Division and the U. City of Fort Worth N. City of Hanford E. City of Hollywood S. City of Jackson S. City of Jacksonville M. The complaint , filed by the United States and the United States Attorney's Office on December 20, , alleged that the City of Jacksonville violated the Fair Housing Act and Americans with Disabilities Act when it refused to allow the development of housing for individuals with disabilities in its Springfield neighborhood.

In , Ability Housing, Inc. The complaint alleged that as a result, Ability Housing lost the grant and the property. City of Janesville N. City of Johnstown, Pa. City of Milwaukee E.

August 2017

City of Mt. Pleasant M. City of New Berlin E. City of Payette, Idaho D. City of Port Jervis S. City of Santa Rosa N. Anthony Village D. Peters W. City of Satsuma, Alabama S. City of Springfield C. The complaint alleges that the City of Springfield, Illinois, discriminated on the basis of disability in violation of the Fair Housing Act by imposing a foot spacing requirement on small group homes for persons with disabilities, while not applying any spacing requirement to similarly situated housing for people without disabilities.

The complaint further alleges that the City failed to provide a reasonable accommodation to a small group home that was located within feet of another such home. City of Sterling Heights E. On March 1, , the court entered a consent order in United States v. The complaint also alleged that the denial imposed a substantial burden on the religious exercise of the community intending to build a mosque without a compelling governmental justification pursued through the least restrictive means and discriminated against the community based on religion or religious denomination.

The consent order requires the city to permit the AICC to construct a mosque in the city. The city has also agreed to publicize its non-discrimination policies and practices, undergo training on the requirements of RLUIPA, and report periodically to the Justice Department. A separate settlement resolving a similar lawsuit brought by the AICC against the city has also been submitted to the court for approval. City of Toledo, Ohio N. City of Walnut, California C. City of Waukegan, Ill. City of Wildwood D.

The engaging in any management duties at the Auburn property and a single family home. The defendant is also enjoined from further discrimination based on gender and must keep records for future review by the Division. The consent decree will remain in effect for three years and three months. On May 10, , the court entered a consent decree resolving United States v.

The consent decree requires standard injnctive relief, non-discriminatory occupany standards, record-keeping, reporting and training. Coldwell Banker Joe T. Lane Realty, Inc. Colts Pride Homeowners Association D. Community State Bank E. Compton Place Associates M. Countrywide Financial Corporation C. County of Culpeper W. The complaint further alleged that the County discriminated against the ICC based on religion. Covenant Retirement Community E. Crank E. The complaint alleges that Gus Crank and Penny Crank, who manage and own rental property in Dayton, Kentucky, violated the Fair Housing Act by engaging in a pattern or practice of sexual harassment against female tenants and coercing, intimidating, threatening, or interfering with tenants in the exercise of their fair housing rights.

On June 16, , the parties entered into a settlement agreement in United States v. Crowe M. The complaint , filed on June 13, , alleged that an Alabama landlord violated the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act "SCRA" when she refused to return any portion of the security deposit to a United States Air Force Major after he lawfully terminated his lease early upon receipt of military orders. The complaint also alleged that the landlord claimed damages to the property that were far in excess of what could appropriately be charged to the tenant. Under the agreement, Ms. Dalton Township, Michigan W.

Dawn Construction, Inc. Dawn Properties, Inc. Dawson Development Co. Deer Run Management Co. DeRaffele D. The jury found that the defendant made an apartment unavailable to the HUD complainants based in substantial part on their familial status. The jury also found that the defendant retaliated against them by filing a lawsuit against them after they filed their HUD complaint.

Delta Funding Corporation E. Deposit Guaranty National Bank N. DKCD, Inc. The agreement also includes a non-discrimination policy, advertising, training and reporting to the United States. The Durst Organization S. Dyersburg Apartments, Ltd. On August 13, , the court entered a consent order resolving United States v. The complaint , filed on October 9, , alleged Dyersburg Apartments, Ltd. Empirian Property Management, Inc. Enclave Development, L. Encore Management Co. The complaint , which was filed on November 14, , alleged that the owner, property management company, district manager, and maintenance employee of a unit apartment building located in Cross Lanes, West Virginia violated the Fair Housing Act by discriminating against tenants on the basis of sex both quid pro quo and hostile environment sexual harassment , and that the owner, manager, district manager, and site manager retaliated against tenants who complained about the sexual harassment.

On August 12, , the court entered a consent order with Encore Management Co. The case came to the Division after the Department of Housing and Urban Development HUD received complaints, conducted an investigation, and issued a charge of discrimination. Envoy Apartments Association, Inc. Epcon Communities, LLC. Ohio , alleging that the defendants failed to design and construct thirty-two condominium properties in Ohio in a manner that complies with the accessibility requirements of the Fair Housing Act.

Evergreen Bank Group N. Equity Residential S. The complaint also alleged that the defendants retaliated by issuing a notice to vacate and by filing an eviction action after complainants filed a fair housing complaint. Fair Plaza Associates D. Falcon Development Corp. Falcon Development Company No. Fidelity Federal Bank E. Fifth Third Bank S. Fifth Third Mortgage M. First American Bank N. First Lowndes Bank M. First Merchants Bank S. On August 12, , the court approved the entry of settlement agreement and agreed order resolving United States v. On June 13, , the United States filed the complaint and proposed settlement.

The complaint alleged that from to at least , First Merchants violated the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act on the basis of race by engaging in unlawful redlining in Indianapolis by intentionally avoiding predominantly African-American neighborhoods. First Merchants will also open a branch and loan production office to serve the banking and credit needs of residents in predominantly African-American neighborhoods in Indianapolis. First National Bank of Gordon D. First National Bank of Pontotoc N.

First National Bank of Vicksburg S. First Site Commercial Inc. First United Bank N. Fitchburg Housing Authority D. Flagstar Corporation and Denny's N. Fleet Mortgage Company E. Fleetwood Capital Development, L. On April 12, , the court approved and entered a consent decree resolving United States v. The complaint , which was filed on November 16, , alleged that the defendants refused to sell property located in the Village of Sherman, County of Sagamon, Illinois to the HUD complainants because the planned use for the property was as a group home for adults with developmental disabilities.

The consent decree will remain in effect for three 3 years. Fort Davis State Bank W. Fort Norfolk Retirement Community, Inc. Fountainbleau Apartments E.

You are here

Fountain View Apartments, Inc. Fox Point at Redstone Ass'n, Inc. On December 27, , the court entered a consent order in United States v. French E. The complaint , which was filed on December 20, , alleged the defendants, David French and Paula French, discriminated on the basis of race, color and familial status by making statements indicating their preference to exclude a mixed-race couple and their child from renting a single family home in Hudson, Michigan in violation of the Fair Housing Act.

Gainesville Housing Authority N. Gambone Brothers Development Company E. The complaint in this HUD election case, which was filed on October 13, , alleges that the owner and manager of an apartment complex in New Brighton, Minnesota violated the Fair Housing Act by refusing to allow plaintiff-intervenor Jane Poeschel to keep an emotional assistance dog.

Under the settlement agreement, the defendants agree to pay Ms. Garden Homes Management Corp. General Properties Company E. Genesis Designer Homes S. Geneva Terrace Apartments, Inc. On November 30, , the court entered a consent decree in United States v. Geneva Terrace W. The complaint , filed October 26, , alleged that Nicolai Quinn, the manager of the apartment complex, told prospective African-American renters that apartments were not available when they were, while telling prospective white renters that there were apartments available.

The defendants will also undergo fair-housing training, and comply with record-keeping and reporting requirements. The case was referred to the Division after the Department of Housing and Urban Development HUD received a complaint from Metro Fair Housing, conducted an investigation, and issued a charge of discrimination. A pattern of practice claim was later added. On May 18, , the court entered a consent decree in United States v. The complaint , filed on May 18, , alleged a pattern or practice of discrimination based on familial status by the corporate owner and agent of a lot mobile home park in Crown Point, Indiana.

Glenwood Management Corp. Glenwood Management S. The complaint, based on a referral from the Department of Housing and Urban Development HUD , alleged that the owner and manager of an apartment building in Manhattan engaged in discrimination on the basis of disability when they refused to rent a unit to the HUD complainants, who have an assistance animal. Gorecki D. The complaint alleges that the owner and property manager of an eight-unit rental property in Foley, Minnesota violated the Fair Housing Act by refusing to allow the HUD complainant to live with an emotional support German Shepard puppy for her minor son, who has Down Syndrome.

Greenbrier Homeowners Association D. Grand Canyon Enterprises D. The complaint alleges that Guaranteed Auto Sales, a used car dealership, its owner Kelly Ann West, and its manager Robert Chesgreen violated the Equal Credit Opportunity Act by offering different terms of credit based on race to customers seeking to purchase and finance used cars in Glen Burnie, Maryland.

The United States alleges that defendants engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination by offering less favorable auto loan terms to African American testers than white testers, including by telling African American testers that they needed larger down payments than white testers for the same used cars, and telling African American testers that they were required to fund their down payments in one lump sum, while they gave white testers an option of paying in two installments. Gulf Shores Apts S. GuideOne Mutual Ins.

Habersham Properties, Inc. Hadlock D. Hatfield W. The complaint , filed on July 13, , alleged that Robert N. Hatfield, who rented, sold, and financed homes in Wilkes County, North Carolina, engaged in a pattern or practice of sexually harassing actual and prospective female residents and borrowers in violation of the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act.

The agreement also includes injunctive relief, including permanently barring Hatfield from participating in the rental, sale, or financing of residential properties. Hawaii Student Suites, Inc. The complaint alleges that the owners and managers of residential rental housing in Honolulu, Hawaii, refused to rent to families with children, in violation of the Fair Housing Act. Hawthorne Gardens Associates D. Hialeah Housing Auth. Higgins S. Highland Management Group, Inc. On August 15, , the court entered a consent decree in United States v.

The testing evidence showed that Somali testers were told to make appointments to see apartments, whereas white testers were shown apartments when they walked in. Hillman Housing Corp. Hilltowne Apartments N. The Home Loan Auditors N. Between August and July , the United States entered into a series of separate settlement agreements with individual defendants to fully resolve its claims in United States v. The amended complaint , filed on May 9, , alleges that the defendants intentionally discriminated against Hispanic homeowners in violation of the federal Fair Housing Act by targeting them for predatory mortgage loan modification services and interfering with their ability to receive financial assistance to maintain their homes.

The United States also alleged the defendants encouraged their clients to stop making mortgage payments and instructed homeowners to cease contact with their lenders, which resulted in clients defaulting on their mortgage payments and losing their homes. Homestead Bldg. Horoy, Inc. Horsley and Horsely Construction D. Housing Authority of Baltimore City D. Housing Authority of Bossier City W. Housing Authority of the City of Aurora D. Housing Authority of the City of Royston M. Housing Authority of the City of Ruston W. Housing Authority of the Town of Milford D. Housing Management Services W.

Hubbard Properties, Inc. On August 26, , the Court entered a consent order resolving United States v. Specifically, the complaint alleged that the defendants violated 42 U. The case was referred to the Division after the Department of Housing and Urban Development received a complaint, conducted an investigation, and issued a charge of discrimination..

Huntington Mortgage Company N. Incorporated Village of Island Park E. Inland Empire Builders D. Irvin W. The complaint also alleged that the defendant retaliated by serving a notice of eviction on the complainant after she made a complaint of housing discrimination to HUD. Jarrah; aka Yurman S. Jarrah; aka Yurman, Land Guardian, Inc. The complaint further alleged that Defendant Jarrah used racial slurs when explicitly instructing employees to exclude African-American, Hispanic and Asian-American patrons from the bar.

The John Buck Company N. The agreement also requires that defendants provide training to their employees on the requirements of the Act, notify the Justice Department of any future construction of multifamily dwellings, and ensure that such housing complies with the requirements of the Act. HUD conducted an investigation, issued a charge of discrimination, and referred the case to the Division. The consent order, includes equitable relief requiring that the defendant, among other items, undergo training, change its policies, and report semi-annually to the United States.

The consent order has a three year term. Kaemmerer S. Kelly S. Kelly D. Kenna Homes Cooperative Corporation S. Kent State University N. Kips Bay Towers Condominium, Inc. Kleinpeter S. KleinBank D. Klosterman S. Albert C. Kobayashi, Inc. The complaint alleges that defendants, the designers and the builder, failed to design and construct five multifamily complexes in Hawaii in a manner that complies with the accessibility requirements of the Fair Housing Act.

Koch D. Kormanik W. Krause W.

North Carolina Digital Collections

Krueger E. Lake County Board of Commissioners N. Landings Real Estate Group D. Larkspur, LLC S. Lawrence Properties, Inc. Lee Enterprises, Inc. Little Rock Planning Commission E. LNL Associates D. Loecher D. Loki Properties D. Long Beach Mortgage Company C. Lora N. Lucas D.

Luke C. Lund D. United States and Dunfee v. Lund W. Luther Burbank Savings C. Lyon D. Jackson S. Lucky Joy Restaurant, Inc. Madsen D. On July 29, , the court entered a consent order resolving United States v. Idaho , a Fair Housing Act election case. The United States also alleged that because of this discrimination, the complainants could not purchase the home of their choice from third-party sellers, and were forced into a far more expensive and less satisfactory home.

The consent order also contains provisions for monitoring of Pioneer Village's tenant and applicant records, and for requiring the defendants to advertise to the public in accordance with HUD's fair housing advertising guidelines. Plaintiff-intervenor Idaho Human Rights Commission joined in the United States' allegations and is a party to the consent order.

Janet Jackson

The case was originally referred to the Division after the Department of Housing and Urban Development HUD received a complaint, conducted an investigation and issued a charge of discrimination. Magee S. Makowsky Construction Company W. Mammarrapallil N. Marti D. Martin Family Trust N. Matusoff Rental Company S. Maui County D. McCoy E. Meadowlark Manor Condominium Association W. Meadows Apartment Limited Partnership D. Meadows of Jupiter, Ltd. Mennino Place, LP D.

Mercker S. Mere M. On March 15, , the court entered a consent order in United States v. The complaint , which was filed on February 29, , alleged that Thomas Mere, the owner and operator of a mobile home and recreational vehicle park, discriminated on the basis of race or color. Specifically, the complaint alleged that the defendant encouraged prospective white renters to consider residing at Mere's Park and discouraged African Americans from residing there by, for example, referring African Americans to another mobile home and RV park, making discouraging comments about units that were available for rent, and failing to provide African Americans complete and accurate information about available units and lots.

The agreement also requires that the defendant implement nondiscriminatory application and rental procedures at the park, undergo fair-housing training and provide periodic reports to the department. Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. Mid America Bank, fsb N. Midwest BankCentre E. Milazzo E. Millikin Univ. Milton D. Mississippi Regional Hous. VIII S. Mitchell S. Moldenhauer D. Montagne Development, Inc. Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corp. Morgan S. The Mortgage Super Center D. MSM Brothers, Inc. National Properties Inc.

Nail M. States v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. Nationwide Nevada D. Nedialkov N. Nejam Properties S. Nelson S. The complaint alleges that Nelson, who owns and manages at least two four-unit rental properties in the San Diego, California area, engaged in a pattern or practice of sexual harassment of and retaliation against female tenants from at least to the present. Nieman N. Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp. On August 1, , the United States filed a complaint and executed a settlement agreement in United States v.

The complaint also alleges that Nissan engaged in a pattern or practice of violating Section of the SCRA by failing to refund lease amounts paid in advance in the form of capitalized cost reduction to servicemembers who terminated their leases early following receipt of qualifying military orders. The agreement also requires Nissan to adopt new polices and training to prevent future violations of the SCRA. Nistler D. Mont Nistler II. Nixon State Bank W. Noble Homes N. Norman W.

Northern Trust Company N. Northwest Trustee Services, Inc. Notre Dame de Namur University N. On April 19, , the United States entered into a settlement agreement resolving the allegations in United States v. Ohnstad C.

Ojeda N. Olmstead D. Orchard Hill Building Co. On July 27, , the court entered a consent decree resolving United States v. Specifically, the housing complexes have inaccessible common areas, inaccessible routes into and through the units, doors that are too narrow for the passage of wheelchairs, and bathrooms that cannot accommodate grab bars.

The consent decree requires the defendants to modify condominium and townhouses that are not in compliance with the Act. Pacific Life Ins. Pacific Northwest Electric, Inc. On October 21, , the court entered a consent decree resolving United States v. Pacific Northwest Electric D. The complaint , which was filed on January 11, , alleged the defendants: Boise, Idaho developers, Walter T.

The consent decree will remain in effect for two years. Pacific Properties and Dev.